Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:39

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why does my vagina always itch so badly after my periods?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
TRUMP memecoin ‘hasn’t pumped’ after Eric Trump says WLF will buy big stack - Cointelegraph
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Does whey protein affect the kidneys?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
IO Interactive Reveals 007 First Light, Full Trailer Out This Week - Game Informer
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do we write and pronounce "it's my pleasure" in Italian?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Study tightens King plot-based constraints on hypothetical fifth force - Phys.org
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: